Lewis reclaims the word 'Charity' from its watered-down modern meaning and sets it against the backdrop of the previous chapter's diagnosis of Pride.

Discussion Questions

6 questions

1.Lewis insists that 'charity' in the Christian sense means love — not just generosity with money. He says Love (in the sense of willing the good of another) is a virtue, not a feeling, and therefore it can be commanded. Why does it matter whether love is primarily a feeling or a choice?

2.He gives the practical advice: do not waste time wondering whether you 'love' your neighbor; act as if you do, and the feeling may follow. How does this connect to the 'pretending' argument from Book II, Chapter 5?

a.Is there someone in your life you would struggle to 'act as if you loved'? What is the first act you could take?

b.Does the idea that love is a practiced choice make it more or less meaningful to you?

3.Lewis warns that charity includes not liking people — he says there are people he finds annoying or disagreeable, and that is fine. What matters is *acting* toward them in their interest. How does this take the pressure off the feeling and put it on the will?

4.He describes how acting lovingly toward someone you dislike tends to produce a genuine affection over time. Has this been true in your experience? Can you think of a relationship where the love preceded the feeling?

5.Lewis connects Charity directly to the opposite of Pride — charity gives without wanting credit; pride seeks to consume and compare. How does charity specifically undo the damage Pride does to relationships?

+ 3 more questions in this week

Get all 176 questions across 29 weeks

Get Full Guide — $24.99