Lewis argues that the Christian virtue of Hope is not wishful thinking but a practical necessity — and that the failure to hope is the engine of much human misery.

Discussion Questions

6 questions

1.Lewis says that hope — longing for the eternal world — is not a form of escapism but one of the things a Christian is meant to do. He argues that people who have contributed most to the world have been precisely those who were most focused on the next. Who are the examples he has in mind, and do you find this claim persuasive?

2.He describes the experience of longing — a sense that nothing in this world ever fully satisfies — and says this is the clue that we were made for another world. Has this longing been part of your experience? What do you do with it?

a.Lewis suggests three common responses to this longing: the fool's way (keep chasing earthly things), the sensible person's way (suppress the longing), and the Christian way (take it seriously as a pointer). Which has been most characteristic of your life?

b.What earthly thing have you most expected to satisfy the longing — and what happened when you got it?

3.He uses the famous illustration: if I find a desire in myself that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world — just as hunger points to the existence of food. How robust is this argument? What are its limits?

4.Lewis says that 'aiming at heaven' does not mean neglecting earth — quite the opposite. People who have nothing to live for beyond this life are actually *less* useful to the present world, not more. Why does hope in eternity produce better earthly engagement, not less?

5.The chapter on Hope comes right after Pride and Charity — why do you think Lewis placed it here? What is the relationship between pride, love, and hope in his moral framework?

+ 3 more questions in this week

Get all 176 questions across 29 weeks

Get Full Guide — $24.99